BACK | HOME
AVOIDING THE CASAUBON DELUSION
In another article on this site, The Casaubon
Delusion, I talk about the lure of totality belief systems.
Succumbing to the temptation to adopt such belief systems is the
delusion in question. Even if you are one of those people who wish to
avoid falling into the toils of the Casaubon delusion, you may find it
difficult to do so. Just because the need to believe can be so great, it
may be difficult to recognize that one is beginning to adopt a totality
belief. It isn't always easy to know that a set of ideas one encounters
for the first time is likely to prove an all-embracing belief system. So
are there any pointers that might warn one that this is likely to
happen? I think there are. Some are in one's own mind, others are in the
belief system itself.
- Within one's own mind, a danger signal is the sheer emotional appeal
of some belief systems when first encountered. The very fact that we
desperately wish something to be true is a pointer to the possibility
that we may select the evidence that seems to support our favoured
belief and ignore whatever contradicts it. Many of us are guilty of
attending only to arguments with which we already agree; we prefer to
bolster our beliefs rather than to challenge them. And the more
important the subject matter of the belief, the more we should be on our
guard. If we have spent many years looking for the answer to a
particular problem, we should be all the more cautious about accepting
any apparent solution that may come our way.
- Totality belief systems have certain features that mark them out
as what they are. One is the tendency to represent the universe as a
giant cipher, to which they uniquely hold the key. We have to be
careful here, because there is a sense in which mainstream science
thinks of the universe in this way too. The difference between a
scientist and someone suffering from the Casaubon delusion is not so
much in the nature of their theories as in their readiness to submit
their ideas to the test of experimental verification, but the
distinction isn't always easy to make. One useful touchstone, I've
found, is the attitude to questions.
- Within many belief systems you find an apparent readiness to accept
questioning, and this may be quite impressive at first. However, this
openness is usually confined within limits. Becoming a member of a group
dedicated to the study and practice of such a system is rather like
learning a new game, with very complicated rules many of which are never
spelled out but have to be picked up as you go along. Peer group
pressure is undoubtedly an important factor in such circumstances.
Psychological experiments have shown that group attitudes can affect how
people perceive things. For example, if you are shown two lines of equal
length when you are a member of a group in which all the other
participants have previously been told to say that the lines are
unequal, it's quite likely that you, too, will perceive them as unequal.
- Because they believe they have discovered or been given the key to a
mystery, adherents of a belief system tend to regard themselves as an
elite. Of course, in-groups are found in all human organizations, but
the very nature of organizations dedicated to the study of esoteric
ideas means that inner subgroups with claims to special knowledge are
particularly likely to arise.
- A feature of many belief systems is that they are said to be of
great antiquity, even if they have apparently arisen quite recently.
Just because the 'knowledge' professed by such groups is said to possess
timeless verity, it can never change. It is therefore static. This
doesn't mean it is boring for students; indeed, these students always
feel their exploration of the esoteric knowledge to be immensely
exciting. The leader of the group often ensures this by progressively
revealing more and more of his ideas as time goes by.
- Another characteristic feature is that the knowledge is usually in
the possession of an inspired teacher. Nearly all totality belief
systems are equipped with at least one guru, who is normally the founder
of the system. He or she may be dead, however, in which case the guru's
mantle will have been draped on the shoulders of one or more disciples.
In extreme cases, where the system is of vast antiquity, the guru will
be a legendary figure, as in traditional Chinese acupuncture, where the
founder is the mythical Yellow Emperor. The only way you can avoid
encountering such a figure is by inventing your own system from scratch,
in which case you will be the guru yourself if you enlist any followers.
- Perhaps the most characteristic feature of belief systems is the
degree of conviction with which they are adhered to. We need to remember
always that the amount of certainty that we feel about our beliefs is
not a reliable guide to their correctness. The subjective sense of
certainty is no guarantee of truth. Indeed, it's often when we find
ourselves most firmly convinced of having attained ultimate truth that
we have fallen most deeply into the toils of the Casaubon delusion.
See also The Casaubon Delusion and Living with Uncertainty
|